Comparison of sensitometric and diagnostic performance of two films.
Identifieur interne : 000529 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000528; suivant : 000530Comparison of sensitometric and diagnostic performance of two films.
Auteurs : S C White [États-Unis] ; D C YoonSource :
- Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995) [ 1548-8578 ] ; 2000.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Absorptiométrie photonique (MeSH), Aire sous la courbe (MeSH), Amélioration d'image radiographique (MeSH), Artéfacts (MeSH), Caries dentaires (imagerie diagnostique), Courbe ROC (MeSH), Dentine (imagerie diagnostique), Film radiographique (classification), Film radiographique (statistiques et données numériques), Humains (MeSH), Loi du khi-deux (MeSH), Molaire (imagerie diagnostique), Optique et photonique (MeSH), Produits de contraste (MeSH), Prémolaire (imagerie diagnostique), Sensibilité et spécificité (MeSH), Émail dentaire (imagerie diagnostique).
- MESH :
- imagerie diagnostique : Caries dentaires, Dentine, Molaire, Prémolaire, Émail dentaire.
- statistiques et données numériques : Film radiographique.
- Absorptiométrie photonique, Aire sous la courbe, Amélioration d'image radiographique, Artéfacts, Courbe ROC, Film radiographique, Humains, Loi du khi-deux, Optique et photonique, Produits de contraste, Sensibilité et spécificité.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Absorptiometry, Photon (MeSH), Area Under Curve (MeSH), Artifacts (MeSH), Bicuspid (diagnostic imaging), Chi-Square Distribution (MeSH), Contrast Media (MeSH), Dental Caries (diagnostic imaging), Dental Enamel (diagnostic imaging), Dentin (diagnostic imaging), Humans (MeSH), Molar (diagnostic imaging), Optics and Photonics (MeSH), ROC Curve (MeSH), Radiographic Image Enhancement (MeSH), Sensitivity and Specificity (MeSH), X-Ray Film (classification), X-Ray Film (statistics & numerical data).
- MESH :
- chemical : Contrast Media.
- classification : X-Ray Film.
- diagnostic imaging : Bicuspid, Dental Caries, Dental Enamel, Dentin, Molar.
- statistics & numerical data : X-Ray Film.
- Absorptiometry, Photon, Area Under Curve, Artifacts, Chi-Square Distribution, Humans, Optics and Photonics, ROC Curve, Radiographic Image Enhancement, Sensitivity and Specificity.
Abstract
The sensitometric properties of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus and Flow E-speed film as well as their diagnostic efficacy for detecting proximal surface caries were compared. Flow and Kodak E-speed films were exposed and processed according to American National Standards Institute and American Dental Association (ADA) specifications, and film speed, contrast, and density of base plus fog were measured. Additionally, 80 premolar and molar teeth were imaged and their proximal surfaces scored by 12 dentists for the presence of caries. The actual depth of the caries was determined by microscopic examination of the teeth after sectioning. Kodak Ektaspeed Plus and Flow E-speed films, although labeled E-speed by the manufacturers, are both slow F-speed films. They have comparable base plus fog densities and comparable contrast curves. Dentists detected carious lesions equally well using both film types. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and receiver operating characteristic area for detecting enamel and dentinal caries were not significantly different between the two films. Kodak Ektaspeed Plus and Flow E-speed films both meet or exceed the ADA performance specifications in terms of sensitometric properties. Both offer equal diagnostic utility for detecting caries.
PubMed: 11199671
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of sensitometric and diagnostic performance of two films.</title><author><name sortKey="White, S C" sort="White, S C" uniqKey="White S" first="S C" last="White">S C White</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Section of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Section of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Californie</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yoon, D C" sort="Yoon, D C" uniqKey="Yoon D" first="D C" last="Yoon">D C Yoon</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2000">2000</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:11199671</idno><idno type="pmid">11199671</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000523</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000523</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000523</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000523</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000523</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of sensitometric and diagnostic performance of two films.</title><author><name sortKey="White, S C" sort="White, S C" uniqKey="White S" first="S C" last="White">S C White</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Section of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Section of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Californie</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yoon, D C" sort="Yoon, D C" uniqKey="Yoon D" first="D C" last="Yoon">D C Yoon</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995)</title><idno type="ISSN">1548-8578</idno><imprint><date when="2000" type="published">2000</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Absorptiometry, Photon (MeSH)</term><term>Area Under Curve (MeSH)</term><term>Artifacts (MeSH)</term><term>Bicuspid (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Chi-Square Distribution (MeSH)</term><term>Contrast Media (MeSH)</term><term>Dental Caries (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Dental Enamel (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Dentin (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Molar (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Optics and Photonics (MeSH)</term><term>ROC Curve (MeSH)</term><term>Radiographic Image Enhancement (MeSH)</term><term>Sensitivity and Specificity (MeSH)</term><term>X-Ray Film (classification)</term><term>X-Ray Film (statistics & numerical data)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Absorptiométrie photonique (MeSH)</term><term>Aire sous la courbe (MeSH)</term><term>Amélioration d'image radiographique (MeSH)</term><term>Artéfacts (MeSH)</term><term>Caries dentaires (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Courbe ROC (MeSH)</term><term>Dentine (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Film radiographique (classification)</term><term>Film radiographique (statistiques et données numériques)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Loi du khi-deux (MeSH)</term><term>Molaire (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Optique et photonique (MeSH)</term><term>Produits de contraste (MeSH)</term><term>Prémolaire (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Sensibilité et spécificité (MeSH)</term><term>Émail dentaire (imagerie diagnostique)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Contrast Media</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="classification" xml:lang="en"><term>X-Ray Film</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Bicuspid</term><term>Dental Caries</term><term>Dental Enamel</term><term>Dentin</term><term>Molar</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="imagerie diagnostique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Caries dentaires</term><term>Dentine</term><term>Molaire</term><term>Prémolaire</term><term>Émail dentaire</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>X-Ray Film</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistiques et données numériques" xml:lang="fr"><term>Film radiographique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Absorptiometry, Photon</term><term>Area Under Curve</term><term>Artifacts</term><term>Chi-Square Distribution</term><term>Humans</term><term>Optics and Photonics</term><term>ROC Curve</term><term>Radiographic Image Enhancement</term><term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Absorptiométrie photonique</term><term>Aire sous la courbe</term><term>Amélioration d'image radiographique</term><term>Artéfacts</term><term>Courbe ROC</term><term>Film radiographique</term><term>Humains</term><term>Loi du khi-deux</term><term>Optique et photonique</term><term>Produits de contraste</term><term>Sensibilité et spécificité</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The sensitometric properties of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus and Flow E-speed film as well as their diagnostic efficacy for detecting proximal surface caries were compared. Flow and Kodak E-speed films were exposed and processed according to American National Standards Institute and American Dental Association (ADA) specifications, and film speed, contrast, and density of base plus fog were measured. Additionally, 80 premolar and molar teeth were imaged and their proximal surfaces scored by 12 dentists for the presence of caries. The actual depth of the caries was determined by microscopic examination of the teeth after sectioning. Kodak Ektaspeed Plus and Flow E-speed films, although labeled E-speed by the manufacturers, are both slow F-speed films. They have comparable base plus fog densities and comparable contrast curves. Dentists detected carious lesions equally well using both film types. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and receiver operating characteristic area for detecting enamel and dentinal caries were not significantly different between the two films. Kodak Ektaspeed Plus and Flow E-speed films both meet or exceed the ADA performance specifications in terms of sensitometric properties. Both offer equal diagnostic utility for detecting caries.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">11199671</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2001</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>15</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>24</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1548-8578</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>21</Volume><Issue>6</Issue><PubDate><Year>2000</Year><Month>Jun</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995)</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Compend Contin Educ Dent</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Comparison of sensitometric and diagnostic performance of two films.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>530-2, 534, 536 passim</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>The sensitometric properties of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus and Flow E-speed film as well as their diagnostic efficacy for detecting proximal surface caries were compared. Flow and Kodak E-speed films were exposed and processed according to American National Standards Institute and American Dental Association (ADA) specifications, and film speed, contrast, and density of base plus fog were measured. Additionally, 80 premolar and molar teeth were imaged and their proximal surfaces scored by 12 dentists for the presence of caries. The actual depth of the caries was determined by microscopic examination of the teeth after sectioning. Kodak Ektaspeed Plus and Flow E-speed films, although labeled E-speed by the manufacturers, are both slow F-speed films. They have comparable base plus fog densities and comparable contrast curves. Dentists detected carious lesions equally well using both film types. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and receiver operating characteristic area for detecting enamel and dentinal caries were not significantly different between the two films. Kodak Ektaspeed Plus and Flow E-speed films both meet or exceed the ADA performance specifications in terms of sensitometric properties. Both offer equal diagnostic utility for detecting caries.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>White</LastName><ForeName>S C</ForeName><Initials>SC</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Section of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Yoon</LastName><ForeName>D C</ForeName><Initials>DC</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Compend Contin Educ Dent</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9600713</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1548-8578</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D003287">Contrast Media</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015502" MajorTopicYN="N">Absorptiometry, Photon</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019540" MajorTopicYN="N">Area Under Curve</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016477" MajorTopicYN="N">Artifacts</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001641" MajorTopicYN="N">Bicuspid</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016009" MajorTopicYN="N">Chi-Square Distribution</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003287" MajorTopicYN="N">Contrast Media</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003731" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Caries</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003743" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Enamel</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003804" MajorTopicYN="N">Dentin</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008963" MajorTopicYN="N">Molar</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055095" MajorTopicYN="N">Optics and Photonics</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012372" MajorTopicYN="N">ROC Curve</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011856" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiographic Image Enhancement</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012680" MajorTopicYN="N">Sensitivity and Specificity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014962" MajorTopicYN="Y">X-Ray Film</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="N">classification</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2001</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>24</Day><Hour>12</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2001</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>10</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2001</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>24</Day><Hour>12</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11199671</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Californie</li></region></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Yoon, D C" sort="Yoon, D C" uniqKey="Yoon D" first="D C" last="Yoon">D C Yoon</name></noCountry><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Californie"><name sortKey="White, S C" sort="White, S C" uniqKey="White S" first="S C" last="White">S C White</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SuicidDentistV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000529 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000529 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= SuicidDentistV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:11199671
|texte= Comparison of sensitometric and diagnostic performance of two films.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:11199671" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a SuicidDentistV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.39. |  |